Reproduction Parts for 1916-1964 Chevrolet Passenger Cars & 1918-1987 Chevrolet & GMC Trucks



Visit the new site at vcca.org

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#461169 08/30/21 08:41 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
35Mike Offline OP
ChatMaster - 3,000
OP Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
I am putting my '36 207 cylinder head back on the engine. The head is fresh from the machine shop and has been surfaced. The block has not been surfaced. I am using a NORS copper and asbestos head gasket. What are your thoughts as to the best gasket sealer to use? Thanks.

Mike


ml.russell1936@gmail.com

Many miles of happy motoring
Filling Station - Chevrolet & GMC Reproduction Parts


Filling Station


35Mike #461173 08/30/21 10:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
I have never used a sealer on any head gasket and had no leakage problems


Gene Schneider
35Mike #461174 08/30/21 10:07 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 10
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 10
On a head gasket I do not usually use anything. If you feel you must use something some of the spray copper coat would not hurt a thing. Use a couple of old head bolts with the bolt head turned down to the nominal bolt size as alignment studs. Cut a slot in the top with a hack saw for easy removal.

35Mike #461176 08/30/21 11:49 AM
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
Hi Mike

I sprayed copper coat on both sides of my 46 head gasket and had excellent results. Nothing oozed out of the edges when done, and no leaks whatsoever.
I look at it as inexpensive insurance against having to tear everything down for a do over in the event of a miserable little seep somewhere.

I've always used a little something on head gaskets.
I used to use a thin gasket shellac, but I really liked the way the spray on stuff worked and how easy it was to control the amount and the evenness of coverage.


Ole S Olson
35Mike #461177 08/30/21 12:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
35Mike Offline OP
ChatMaster - 3,000
OP Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
Thanks for the input, everyone. I cut the heads off a couple of 1/2 inch bolts so I can use them for guides. I have chased the threads in the block and cleaned the bolts on my wire brush wheel. I will use some anti-seize on the bolts. Am I forgetting anything?

Mike


ml.russell1936@gmail.com

Many miles of happy motoring
35Mike #461179 08/30/21 12:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
I used a screw driver and air to blow the bolt holes out in the block after cleaning just to be sure the head bolts didn't bottom out before they had the head tightened down.


Ole S Olson
35Mike #461180 08/30/21 12:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,024
Likes: 99
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,024
Likes: 99
Hi Mike,

Unless there are specific instructions from the manufacturer of the head gasket I do like to use a thin coat of the spray copper coat. Maybe it is just “mental security”. I also like that it helps keep the head gasket in place as you lower the head on to the block, even when you use a couple of guide studs.

I agree with your practice of chasing the threads in the block. After I chase the threads I do spray some brake cleaner down the holes to wash any dirt or fine shavings out of the threads. I use a thin screwdriver with a rag wrapped around it to soak up whatever in in the bottom of the hole. Then let the threads dry.

I do agree that there should be some type of lubricant on the bolt threads. I prefer a very light coat of engine oil. Anti-seize is pretty slippery so it makes it easy to over-tighten the bolt. You can also end up with a puddle or ring of anti-seize at the top of the threads unless you really control how much you use. Oil will tend to flow down through the threads.

We all have our preferences for doing tasks like these. You are definitely taking all the right steps so I know the results will be great.

It is also great to know that you are making progress.


Rusty

VCCA #44680
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
I use engine oil on the threads as well.

I also only oil the bolt itself, as oil or anti seize in the bottom of the hole can cause a "hydraulic lock" which will prevent the bolt from tightening down on the head, or worse yet cause a small crack down there.

Last edited by Stovblt; 08/30/21 01:38 PM.

Ole S Olson
35Mike #461212 08/31/21 06:01 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,149
Likes: 42
ChatMaster - 6,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 6,000
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,149
Likes: 42
I often use a product called "Hollymar" spray on copper head gaskets though I also have not used anything with no adverse results. Thread cleaning is a must and oiling the threads is highly recommended.
Tony


1938 1/2 ton Hope to drive it before I retire
35Mike #461218 08/31/21 08:06 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689
Likes: 21
ChatMaster - 6,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 6,000
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689
Likes: 21
I agree with Gene, here. After all the thing is called a "gasket" and thus it will do its job without any help from any other "helper" sealer. With proper head bolt reach and torque the gasket is designed to form and fill any slight imperfections that may be on the head or block. If the head and block surfaces are so screwed up that the gasket alone will not serve then you have a problem that no sealer will serve any worthwhile purpose except prolonging an eventual leak of compression.

Why in the world do we keep over-thinking these things. bonkJust make sure that block and head are smooth and the dang gasket alone will do just fine. No stinkin' sealer needed here.

Don't think that owing to no problems after using a sealer that it had anything to do with such success. It didn't. It's hard to prove a negative: that's why we mislead ourselves here. dance

Best,

Charlie computer

35Mike #461221 08/31/21 09:39 AM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
35Mike Offline OP
ChatMaster - 3,000
OP Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
Charlie,
As always, thank you for your thoughtful and sensitive response.

Mike


ml.russell1936@gmail.com

Many miles of happy motoring
35Mike #461239 08/31/21 09:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
35Mike Offline OP
ChatMaster - 3,000
OP Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
I decided to "go commando" and not use a sealer. After chasing the threads in the block and blowing them clean, I put a dab of anti seize on the first few threads of each bolt and every one of them turned down to touch the head with my fingers.
It was too late to continue with torquing so it will wait until another time. Is 70-75 ft. lbs. the right number?

Mike


ml.russell1936@gmail.com

Many miles of happy motoring
35Mike #461243 08/31/21 11:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
Hi Mike

I just deleted a post as I gave the spec for a 216, which was different than your number, then realized you are working on a 207.
And I don't recall what I torqued my 1929 to, so I guess I'm no help at all. :-)


Ole S Olson
35Mike #461249 09/01/21 04:55 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,149
Likes: 42
ChatMaster - 6,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 6,000
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,149
Likes: 42
I dont know the correct torque is but 70ftlb sounds a little over tight for those old bolts and block, (newer grade 8 bolts yes they will handle it) I wouldnt go much over 55lbft.
Tony


1938 1/2 ton Hope to drive it before I retire
35Mike #461258 09/01/21 10:32 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 30
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 30
the notes i have from this site is as below:

Cylinder Head Bolt OLD: 55 to 65 ft-lb
Cylinder Head Bolt NEW: 65 to 75 ft-lb

That is what i used on my 1929 as i am rebuilding it now. i did 70ft-lb and did so in three steps. and followed the torque sequence in the repair manual.

I used a NEW set from TFS


AACA - VCCA - Stovebolt - ChevyTalk
Love the Antique Chevrolet's from 1928-1932
The Beauty, Simplicity, History, and the Stories they Tell
35Mike #461270 09/01/21 12:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
35Mike Offline OP
ChatMaster - 3,000
OP Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,469
Likes: 48
Thanks for the wake-up call, guys. I should have known better than 70/75. The bolts were new old stock about 10 years ago, but they have had a busy life. This will be their 4th torquing.

Mike

Last edited by 35Mike; 09/01/21 12:40 PM.

ml.russell1936@gmail.com

Many miles of happy motoring
35Mike #461277 09/01/21 02:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,472
Likes: 26
ChatMaster - 7,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 7,000
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,472
Likes: 26
From some charts I viewed on supplier sites lubricated bolt torque is about half of dry specs.


Steve D
35Mike #461278 09/01/21 02:56 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 30
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 30
generally specified torque specs for hardware is DRY (Clean & Dry) ANY film, liquid, dry compound, tape, etc alters the specification as it alters the mating surface of the hardware.in the field we tell them clean and dry for torque.


AACA - VCCA - Stovebolt - ChevyTalk
Love the Antique Chevrolet's from 1928-1932
The Beauty, Simplicity, History, and the Stories they Tell
m006840 #461288 09/01/21 03:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 75
Hi Steve

My charts (John Deere etc) have oiled torques closer to 3/4 of dry.
And I always oil threads. Always.

Two reasons for this.

First of course is that things don't rust together and can be taken apart if needed.
And no, they don't fall apart by themselves more easily. In fact quite the opposite, by way of my second reason.

Second, no matter how clean dry threads are, the frictional characteristics can and do vary considerably from bolt to bolt.
Because we are overcoming the friction of the threads before we even begin to torque in any bolt stretch, the TRUE tightness can vary quite a bit with dry threads.
This is why some engine manufacturers gave bolt stretch specifications instead of final torque specs for critical bolts.
And so some bolts may in fact not really be that tight at all when done. These are the bolts that eventually work loose.
My 1942-46 Chevrolet Service Manual quite clearly specifies oiled threads for both mains and connecting rods. And they stay put, even without pal nuts.
I don't think I've ever had an oiled and torqued bolt come loose

I do however torque slowly and with a steady motion, as you can more easily over run the torque if you go too fast.

Last edited by Stovblt; 09/01/21 04:01 PM.

Ole S Olson
35Mike #461296 09/01/21 06:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,758
Likes: 64
ChatMaster - 15,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 15,000
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,758
Likes: 64
I just torqued the used head bolts on a 1932 engine to 60 ft-lbs oiled. Did the tightening to each value 30 to 60 by 10 ft.-lbs steps. Tightened and loosened at least 3 times at each step. My key is that the wrench ended in the same position as the last time. I was taught that by an old timer many, many years ago. What he explained was that the imperfections in the threads will be flattened out each time they pass by each other. I have found that re torquing basically doesn't change much after the engine has been run.


How Sweet the roar of a Chevy four!

Link Copied to Clipboard
 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5