Reproduction Parts for 1916-1964 Chevrolet Passenger Cars & 1918-1987 Chevrolet & GMC Trucks



Visit the new site at vcca.org

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
I have seen this item in the past and have spoken to one member who believes they improved his vehicle. Are there any others with comments or a supply?

Filling Station - Chevrolet & GMC Reproduction Parts


Filling Station


Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
When I worked in a Chevrolet dealership in the '50's we installed floater pins, especially in the 1949 and 1950 models. I have them in my present 1950 and had them in my original 1950 back in 1952.
They do give a slight self energizing effect reducing pedal pressure. Work best when the brakes are aduusted up all the way, looses some power as pedal travel increases.
The are two different styles, some with a rubber bushing and some all metal.
I had the rubber type in my first 1950 and have the all metal in my present 1950.
The other thing that can reduce pedal pressure in a 1950 (works in 1951 and 1952 also) is to install a 7/8" 1953-54 Master cylinder.
Have that in my 1950 also. Especially desireable in a Power Glide or a stick changed to a 3.55 axle ratio as that gives you less engine braking.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,323
Likes: 6
ChatMaster - 2,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 2,000
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,323
Likes: 6
I would like to be educated on the theory behind this special part. This is very intriguing to me.


My 1951 1 Ton is now on the road! My 38 Master 4 Door is also now on the road .
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Picture a brake with only one shoe. Outward pressure from the wheel cylinder or cam if mechanical creates friction between the shoe and the drum. This frictional force has an outward component which increases the pressure of the shoe. It tries to jam itself in place. This is called self energizing. If you add another shoe to the system as in the Huck brake with a fixed anchor pin that shoe will not be self energizing because the frictional force will not have the outward component. Hence as the manuals say 75% of the total braking is on the forward shoe. The Bendix system does not have the fixed anchor pin to correct this. In an attempt to improve the Huck they created a sloppy fit of the anchor pin to allow the first shoe to add some outward force to the second shoe from the lower end.
I hope this makes sense. The 50 Powerglide that I have has a weight problem that make the brakes a concern. My 35 standard with mechanicals of roughly the same size works much better

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,323
Likes: 6
ChatMaster - 2,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 2,000
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,323
Likes: 6
Thanks for that explanation, very interesting. As a comment both my 1951 1 Ton and my 38 Master stop really well. However the 1 Ton takes more muscle than the 38 Master. I often wonder what the 1 Ton was like to stop with a full load. They didn't have brake assist as standard equipment at the 1 Ton level i believe.


My 1951 1 Ton is now on the road! My 38 Master 4 Door is also now on the road .
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
The Chevrolet car had the same (size) braking, . drums, shoes, master cylinder bore size) from 1936-1950. I always thought the 1936-1948 brakes, cars and 1/2 ton trucks, were adquate . For some reason the 1949 and 1950 required much higher pedal pressure even though for the most part the car weight was about the same,

The big improvement came in 1951 with the Bendix self energizing brakes and another improvement in 1953 when the master cylinder bore was educed to 7/8".
In 1955 everyhing stayed the same, bore back to 1" but thesuspended pedal had more leverage.
The trucks went to Bendix brakes in 1953
The 3/4 ton and up truck brakes went to Bendix in1953 and that was a good and needed improvemet.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 03/13/18 06:08 PM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 935
Likes: 12
ChatMaster - 750
Offline
ChatMaster - 750
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 935
Likes: 12
These so called "floater Pins" can be installed on any 36-50 Chev cars?? If so, is this product still available and what is the installation difficulty level? If they improve the braking system I all for it. On my 47 I seem to have adequate stopping ability but I don't think I could ever lock up in a emergency situation. Of course one does not want the wheel sliding thus we now have anti lock systems on new cars.

dick

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
If a sample were found I think that todays CNC machining could easily duplicate them in quantity.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
Yes, they are for 1936-1950 cars and 1/2 ton trucks.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,894
ChatMaster - 1,500
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,500
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,894
Here's some pics of some

Attached Images
Hotco brake energizers ad.jpg Floatco.jpg Hotco brake energizers 2.jpg
Last edited by canadiantim; 03/14/18 11:11 PM.

1938 Canadian Pontiac Business Coupe (aka a 1938 Chevy Coupe with Pontiac shaped front sheet metal - almost all Chevy!)
1975 4-speed L82 Vette
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
That is the version I have in my present 1950.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,894
ChatMaster - 1,500
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,500
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,894
Added another picture - Which set did you use Gene?


1938 Canadian Pontiac Business Coupe (aka a 1938 Chevy Coupe with Pontiac shaped front sheet metal - almost all Chevy!)
1975 4-speed L82 Vette
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
The Floato with the little balls in the center.

The ones we used years ago had rubber with a band of metal around it in the center. The rubber tended to break down after a while. They were called floating in the name - like brake floating pins.
I will look and see if I saved the box for thepresent set. I did save the original pins just in case.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Found Floato pins on ebay and looking for delivery. Success!!

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
Keep us informed and make sure no wheel cylinder pistons are sticking.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 128
Floato pins installed. Wish I had a lift instead of my aching back crawling under for adjustments. Found three wheel cylinders that needed attention, one required new pistons, the others just a good cleaning .Amazing how many devices benefit from disassembly , cleaning and put it back together,

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 161
THH Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 161
Just curious. In your opinion did the Floato Pins make a difference? What about the reinforced anchor in the wheel cylinder - how did that go? I have a 36 Master and just wondering if they are worth the install.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
I installed them in my 1950 that I had in 1952 and in my present 1950. I would guess they reduced pedal pressure by about 15%. The 1949 and 1950's for some reason required a lot of brake pressure, especially with Power Glide. (or if you insstall a 3.55 rear end in a stick).
My '39 (same brakes as your 1936) had good brakes and see no reason to install them in anything but a 1949-1950.
If you installed new brake linings in your 1936 you will find a portion of the lining surface is not contacting the drum, give them a chance to wear in.
I assume that your 1936 is a Master.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,801
Likes: 1
ChatMaster - 3,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,801
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Chev Nut
The Chevrolet car had the same (size) braking, . drums, shoes, master cylinder bore size) from 1936-1950. I always thought the 1936-1948 brakes, cars and 1/2 ton trucks, were adquate . For some reason the 1949 and 1950 required much higher pedal pressure even though for the most part the car weight was about the same,

The big improvement came in 1951 with the Bendix self energizing brakes and another improvement in 1953 when the master cylinder bore was educed to 7/8".
In 1955 everyhing stayed the same, bore back to 1" but thesuspended pedal had more leverage.
The trucks went to Bendix brakes in 1953
The 3/4 ton and up truck brakes went to Bendix in1953 and that was a good and needed improvemet.

So Gene, the 7/8" diameter master cylinder would be beneficial on my '51, even though my '51 STYLELINE already has the Bendix setup ?



1951 Chevy Styleline Deluxe 2 door sedan / purchased from second owner 6-19-2000.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
Yes it would. Make a marked difference.
I have a 7/8" M.Cyl on my 1950. Made an improvement on that model also.
It does increase pedal travel a small amount requiring more frequent adjustments but I can live with that especially considering how few miles you put on in a year..


Gene Schneider
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,801
Likes: 1
ChatMaster - 3,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,801
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Chev Nut
Yes it would. Make a marked difference.
I have a 7/8" M.Cyl on my 1950. Made an improvement on that model also.
It does increase pedal travel a small amount requiring more frequent adjustments but I can live with that especially considering how few miles you put on in a year..

Thanks Gene.



1951 Chevy Styleline Deluxe 2 door sedan / purchased from second owner 6-19-2000.

Link Copied to Clipboard
 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5