Reproduction Parts for 1916-1964 Chevrolet Passenger Cars & 1918-1987 Chevrolet & GMC Trucks


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
AMS Offline OP
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Hi.
I know rod bearing clearance has been discussed earlier, and I would like your advice...

I finished the restoration of my 1934 Master in 2017.
I got help to rebuild the engine, it was done by a local shop. The rod bearings were all adjusted with shims to be "loose", you could move them front-back by hand (about 0.0015-0,002" bearing clearance), because the shop thought this was the correct clearance.

I have driven the car about 200 miles since it was finished, and everything seems to be ok (no "bad" sounds that I can hear).

I have later found out that the rod bearings were not adjusted correctly, the rod bearings should be adjusted so tight that you need "the light tap of an 8-oz hammer" to move them front-back.

So, my question is:
Should I drop the oil pan and try to adjust the rod bearings tighter, even if the engine seems ok...?

What is the idea with the very tight rod bearing clearances? Will the bearings "wear to fit" (more clearance) after a while?

Thanks!

Filling Station - Chevrolet & GMC Reproduction Parts


Filling Station


Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
If it were mine I would drive it for a few hundred miles and then see if you can hear any rod noise after the oil is good and hot. (oil thined out).
If no noise just be mindful of rod noise. It is not unusual for the rods to loosen up a little in the first few thousand miles due to high spots and babbitt compressing.
If the rods are adjusted the "correct" way the engine usually turns over slow when hot in the first 1000 miles.
The loose adjustment used would be more correct for 216-235 engines as they had larger rod journals according to Chevrolet.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,294
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,294
If they are the 0.0015, they should be ok.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 29,847
Tech Advisor
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
Tech Advisor
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 29,847
My rods were set up by a local engine shop at .0015" (one was set at .002") on my rebuilt engine and the rods started knocking almost immediately. Adjusted the rods to the correct clearance like they should have been done the first time and that stopped the rod knock. Learned never to take a vintage engine to a local machine shop if it was to be done correctly.

laugh wink beer2


The Mangy Old Mutt

"If It's Not Junk.....It's Not Treasure!"
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
If the engine was rebuilt using aluminum pistons the rods may not make noise due to the less load of the light pistons ?


Gene Schneider
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
AMS Offline OP
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Originally Posted by Chev Nut
If the engine was rebuilt using aluminum pistons the rods may not make noise due to the less load of the light pistons ?
Thanks for the replys!
Yes, aluminium pistons.
To be safe, it might be a good idea to drop the oil pan and re-adjust the bearings then, right?
Then I will not be worried and listening for "bad noises" all the time when I drive the car (I am not exactly sure what rod knock sounds like either - other than I guess it is a knocking sound...)

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
If you re-adjust them for peace of mind I wouuld put a few more easy miles on it and do it at about 400 total miles. That is a good time to change the oil for the first time also. This will allow time for the high spots to wear in and get a good adjustment.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 29,847
Tech Advisor
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
Tech Advisor
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 29,847
Quote
To be safe, it might be a good idea to drop the oil pan and re-adjust the bearings then, right?

Yes! That way you will have peace of mind. Also, you can do as Gene suggests....wait about 400 or 500 miles to allow everything to "wear in" and then readjust the rod bearings. It wouldn't hurt to re-torque the cylinder head at that time as well.

laugh wink beer2


The Mangy Old Mutt

"If It's Not Junk.....It's Not Treasure!"
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Shade Tree Mechanic
Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
since the oil pan is off I may as well adjust the rods, I guess.

in a previous life I have worked on many Model A Fords.

we have an ingenious method of setting the Ford rod bearings using a double layer of heavy-duty aluminum foil to create a go-no-go process and get the right amount of shims in the rods. gives more accurate results than Plastigauge.

will this work on my '35 216 engine?


Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 62
ChatMaster - 15,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 15,000
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,756
Likes: 62
Should work just fine. Don't know the thickness of aluminum foil but as long as it can be combined to result in 0.0005"-0.001" it definitely will be better than Plastigauge. I have found Plastigauge to be very inaccurate with thicker babbitt bearings such is Chevrolet 6 cylinder engines 1929-1953.


How Sweet the roar of a Chevy four!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
By the way, a 1934 engine is the old fashioned 207 engine and shares almost no parts with a 1937 and up 216 engine.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 02/15/18 03:57 PM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
AMS Offline OP
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Originally Posted by Chev Nut
If you re-adjust them for peace of mind I wouuld put a few more easy miles on it and do it at about 400 total miles. That is a good time to change the oil for the first time also. This will allow time for the high spots to wear in and get a good adjustment.
The old, original rods/bearings (and crank) was reused when my engine was rebuilt (they were only re-shimmed).
Will there still be "high spots to wear in" and should I still put more miles on the engine before adjusting the rod bearings, or is this relevant only if you have new bearings/rods?

Last edited by AMS; 02/15/18 06:38 PM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
If the original rods were used (in the same location) with the original crank there will be no igh spots to wear in and the babbitt is already compressed. Just do not make them too tight. IF THERE IS A QUESTION/DOUBT KEEP THEM ON THE LOOSE SIDE. yOU MAY BE ABLE TO REMOVE TWO SILVER SHIMS OR ONE COPPER COLORED.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,478
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,478
The way I was taught to do these when a young boy by my father and grandfather was:
On number one, Then on number two when finished with number one, and onto three, etc. Pull shim, tighten cap in place snugly but not enough to damage the lead, use hand crank to turn the engine over. If it does not turn over (locked up) place shim, turn over with shim in place and that is good enough. When you do not get it to lock up by removing shims then you must carefully hand file across the cap where the bolts go through the lead and where the shims are located. When it hangs up then place shims until it is free. This is the "old time" way of doing it. Your so called "clearance" is indicated by the "shim size".00001; .00005 and up. Also, when starting do not "race" the engine as you do not have oil pressure to cushion the caps. Remember these are soft lead and tend to self adjust themselves to the main depending on oil pressure. That is why in the above running some couple or few hundred miles is advised provided no "bad" noises. If it was my engine I would not re-adjust after the break in miles if there were no "bad" noises. Your so called clearances being unimportant by the adjustments made by the oil, soft lead and shims on the main.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 87
Shade Tree Mechanic
Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 87
I agree with some of the others on running it for a few hundred miles first

The Old Timer VCCA member who adjusted my 1933 Master rod bearings back in 1975 used the 8 oz ball peen hammer method and the car has been running with no issues since that time.

One at a time he would tap on the rod caps to find a loose bearing and then remove one shim from each side on the loose connecting rod. After reassembling each bearing he would lightly tap the rod back and fourth with the hammer again and if it would not move with a light tap he would add a single shim to one side and test it again after reassembly. So on and so forth until he had all bearing adjusted.


Visit my website at: www.jakegingervila.wixsite.com/bobs-vintage-cars-

Vila
1933 Chevrolet
1962 Triumph TR4
1964 Vespa VNB5T Scooter
1984 BMW 633 CSi
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
Backyard Mechanic
Offline
Backyard Mechanic
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
I have never been into a babbit bearing engine like this.

Are y'all telling me there are shims on each side of the rod cap, where it bolts to the rod, to adjust bearing to crank journal clearance?

Doug

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
Yes, that is correct. It works better than what you think. Was common for all makes that did not use inserts.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
Backyard Mechanic
Offline
Backyard Mechanic
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
Looking around to educate myself, i find shims for sale from one outfit that are .009" thick, and some other place has .002" shims, with nothing in between.

Where are you getting shims in various in between thicknesses? or are you making them out of shim stock?

Doug

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
Chevrolet installed 4 .001" silver shims and two .002" copper shims on each side if I remember correctly.
Rebuilt (rebabbitted) rods had various amounts and some ad a spacer abiut n.020" thick spacer along with the shims.
When no shims were left the caps were filed if the babbitt still looked good.
Up to 1o and including 1932 the babbitt was .047" thick on new Chevrolet rods, From 1933 and up .024", In 1948 it was reduced down to .003" -.007" for longer life between rod adjustments. The thinner babbitt did not compress as much. This was the trend for engines with rod inserts also.
Chevrolet did not sell under sized rods for use when the journal was turned down to a smaller size. The aftermarket sold under sized rods down to .030" by increasing the thickness of the babbitt. They did not stand up well and either the babbitt melted or compress excessively and the rods would keep lossening up.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 02/19/18 06:33 PM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 47
ChatMaster - 3,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 3,000
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,511
Likes: 47
Chevgene, fantastic technical information!!!

Thanks, Dean


Dean 'Rustoholic' Meltz
old and ugly is beautiful!



Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
Backyard Mechanic
Offline
Backyard Mechanic
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 237
Originally Posted by Chev Nut
Yes, that is correct. It works better than what you think. .

On a non pressure rod oil lube system at low RPM, I can see why it would work. At 7000 RPM, eh, not so much.

Thanks for the info!

Doug

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
The dipper system works fairly well up to abut 3000 RPM. Chevrolet in the 1933 -34 engine and Hudson used the dipper system and babbitted rods on most engines til 1953.The later Chevrolet with dippers and oil jets directly to the dippers was good up to about at steady 3500 RPM.
Most cars had rod inserts by 1933 or so. Chevrolet, Hudson not til 1948 (for Hudsom 6) an the 8 til lits end in 1953. Buick changed to inserts in mid 1948 but has full pressure oilng in the '20's.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
AMS Offline OP
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Thanks for all replys and information!
The rod nuts on my 34 master should be torqued to 40 foot pounds (or more - if the nut does not line up with the pin), is that correct?
If I will not be able to have the same shims on each side, does it matter which side have most / least shims?

Last edited by AMS; 02/20/18 06:21 PM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,699
Likes: 141
If they don't line-up at 40 go a little tighter. They didn't even have a torque spec in 1934.It dosen't matter which side odd number of shims are but Chevrolet suggested the camshaft side and was more of a way to remember what side had what.

Please let us know how many shims you removed.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 02/20/18 08:50 PM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
AMS Offline OP
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 79
I have taken down the oil pan and started checking / adjusting the rod bearings today.
I have not finished yet, but it looks like I will be removing 0,001" on each side (or 0,002" on one side) on most of the rod bearings.

But I ran into an issue on rod number 5..... I am not sure how serious this problem is:
When I rotate the crank, I have clearance on the rod bearing (the bearing is "loose") on part of the rotation, and no clearance (I have to tap the rod with a hammer to get movement) on part og the rotation. Something is not round...
I guess it has to be the rod journal that is a little "egg-shaped". Or can it also be the rod side that is "egg-shaped"?
I am not sure if I have to adress this issue, or if the engine can run ok as it is...?


Last edited by AMS; 02/22/18 08:14 PM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Support The VCCA!

Enjoy the forum? Become a VCCA member! The World's Best Chevrolet and GMC Club!


Member Photos
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
by DreamChevy, February 17
My 1933 Chevy 2 Dr. Sedan
My 1933 Chevy 2 Dr. Sedan
by 1939Chevy1, November 24
Back on the road 79 years later
2 1927 Chevrolet Trucks
2 1927 Chevrolet Trucks
by 1927TRUCKS, June 7
Who's Online Now
2 members (Peter_Gariepy, 1 invisible), 74 guests, and 21 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
NeilA, Jayhicks, Tomvanhouten, Dads29Chevy, Tractorman
18,308 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
aristech, RalphL, tonysk
Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics59,071
Posts429,069
Members18,308
Most Online1,133
Jan 22nd, 2020
 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5