Hi Jiainis,
I would try to replace the entire mount with the correct one. My rational is that the design of yours is specific to a certain year and lacks the ability to be adjusted as you mount the transmission and rest of the drive train. You will see in my pictures that the bolt holes are oval allowing for slight adjustments. I am also suspicious of the height of your mount which could cause a problem at the speeds you want to drive your car!!! Does it matter if your transmission sits a quarter of an inch or more higher? Are your rear motor mounts able to adjust to this extra height?
When I have replaced my transmission or engine I have kept the bolts loose that anchor the transmission. I let the transmission find its own centering point before tightening up the bolts.
The new rubber pieces are installed in my mount with one piece sandwiched between the top plate and the other under the mount held in place by the thin metal cover that comes with the kit.
I can sell you the mount in the picture. I am traveling so can not put it in the mail until next Friday/Saturday.
Good wishes, Mike
P.S. German ingenuity could be used to redesign the mount by filling in the top plate of the mount with welded plugs??
After looking more carefully at your mount I see that the rubber area is where your mount can be adjusted to center the transmission. To me this means all the rubber is absorbing the different drivetrain alignments and movements. My mount puts almost no torque on the rubber component, and removes them from having a substantial impact on any movement in the drivetrain???
Would others please comment on my perceived interpretation of the differences in these two mounts. Jianis will want to drive his car at expressway (autobahn) speeds. Was his mount designed for this???
![[Linked Image from i1321.photobucket.com]](http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/u560/41chevymike/IMG_3525_zpsldr9g3ka.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i1321.photobucket.com]](http://i1321.photobucket.com/albums/u560/41chevymike/IMG_3526_zpspyfvkxqf.jpg)