Reproduction Parts for 1916-1964 Chevrolet Passenger Cars & 1918-1987 Chevrolet & GMC Trucks



Visit the new site at vcca.org

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#51417 03/23/02 03:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 39
Shade Tree Mechanic
OP Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 39
In this day and age of space age lubricants, wouldn't it be advisable to fork out the extra cash to put a super duper lubricant in the engine. Lets face it, engine rebuilds cost an arm and a leg, let alone the inconvenience. And a lot of damage is caused by lubricant breakdown and contamination. My 28 has a good filter on it. I drive it every day to and from my work, and I change the oil every 1500 -2000 miles. Parts are getting harder to find, and more expensive to repair. Any thoughts on this topic???

Filling Station - Chevrolet & GMC Reproduction Parts


Filling Station


#51418 03/23/02 09:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 168
Shade Tree Mechanic
Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 168
As a relative beginner in the vehicle restoration game, I would like to see comprehensive description of recommended oils. For example, what type of oil should I use in my 28 engine? Where I live rarely gets down to freezing, so the choice probably is not as critical for me as it may be for those of you living in North America/Canada/UK.
Tim.


He who ignores the rudder answers to the rocks. When Fear advances, Logic retreats. I could go on...
#51419 03/25/02 07:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,758
Likes: 63
ChatMaster - 15,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 15,000
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 19,758
Likes: 63
Synthetic oils have superior properties compared to mineral oils. They will give better protection and longer life in modern engines. I am not sure about older engines. Modern engines have higher crankcase temperatures, much better sealing, less leakage past rings, etc. so contamination from exhaust gas, fuel dilution, water retention are all less than will be expected from then older engines. The major problem with oil life is contamination which produces corrosive acids and oxidation of the base oil. It is not breakdown of the oil from friction. If you could analyse the oil periodically then you could determine if synthetics would be good for your engine. It would be expensive and likely not worth the cost. Changing mineral oil based lubricants often is easy and is cheap insurance.


How Sweet the roar of a Chevy four!
#51420 03/26/02 02:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,162
ChatMaster - 10,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 10,000
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,162
Another factor that should be considered is filtration, modern engines do a much better job of captureing much smaller particles than any of the older filters do. The old by-pass filters used up thru 1954 and even later on some models were only emergency traps for the most part. therefore the best one could do is to change the oil often. I have noticed that the oil in my 53 (when useing the same high performance oil as I use in a modern 350) gets dirty much quicker than it does in the modern engine driven in the same environment, I wonder if this is an indication of the differences in the engines and maybe the oil in older engines must be changed much quicker there are more differences than we realize in the old and new, if so maybe the difference in cost will justify useing a petroleum based motor oil rather than the expensive syn. oil? chevy


Life's a long winding trail, love Jesus and ride a good horse!

Link Copied to Clipboard
 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5