Reproduction Parts for 1916-1964 Chevrolet Passenger Cars & 1918-1987 Chevrolet & GMC Trucks


Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#467629 03/04/22 01:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Is there a source for patterns to make or outright purchase the oil nozzle height gauge, oil pan target gauge and oil trough gauge?
I have done some searching but still don’t understand how the tubing inside the oil pan is disconnected prior to removing the oil pan on a 1947 second series 3100 panel truck.

I recently unstuck the engine after a five year soak.
When I drained out the oil, about a half gallon oil water came out first.
I believe that this engine has 56,000 miles according to the odometer and grandsons of the original owner. They said he stopped driving it in 1958 when it started to develop a knock.
I did fill the block with water with the oil pan plug out and it’s not flowing out anywhere so I assume it got in through the valve cover vents. I’m hoping the wear isn’t too bad and it’s possible to remove some shims to correct the tolerances.
Probably just wishful thinking but I’m hoping that it won’t need a full rebuild….

Filling Station - Chevrolet & GMC Reproduction Parts


Filling Station


Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
If you do some google searches you will find the dimensions of the depth gauge. I made mine. Someone who has the profile gauge traced theirs on apiece of cardboard which I used to check the trough profile.

To aim the nozzles I marked the center line of each trough down the side of the pan. I made an adapter so I could feed water at very low pressure through the nozzles. I made sure that the water stream struck the side of the pan in line with those marks.

Attached Images
P4090020.JPG P4090034.JPG P4090051.JPG P4090056.JPG P4090062.JPG

Rusty

VCCA #44680
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
There is no mechanical attachment between the nozzle piping and the oil pump outlet. They just slide together when you install the oil pan.


Rusty

VCCA #44680
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Thanks for the information.
You’re right, another Google search brought me right back here!

https://vccachat.org/ubbthreads.php/topics/104389/setting-up-oil-nozzles-and-tools.html

Thanks for letting me know how the tubing connects.

Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
Hi Kevin

The tools you need are hard to find if you want to buy them.
But there are a few places that rent them.
Some of them want ludicrous amounts of money for the rental and HORRENDOUS deposits on the tools. (So people don't just keep them.)
I suggest calling this guy:
https://www.vintageautotools.com/vintage-auto-tools-for-rent-J969.html

I bought a tool for Carter carburetors from him and was very satisfied.
I thought he was in California then, but see he is in South Dakota now (I could be wrong about this).
Anyway we discussed renting the oil pan tools then but shipping the tools over the border to Canada and back was prohibitive.
I got very lucky and found a set of tools myself.
I'm glad I did because I had one nozzle quite low and about a half inch to the side of the target gauge hole.

You SHOULD have a 216 in a 3100 1/2 ton.
So be aware that the target gauge is the same for 216's and the old 235's (J-969-1).
But the gauge for trough depth and dipper height IS NOT. (J-969-2 for 216's) (J-1646-A for 235's up to 1946, and I think J-1541 for 235's 1947-48?).
So just be sure someone hasn't swapped in a 235.

I like using the proper tools because I figure this concerns the "life blood" of the engine.
But that's just me.
Many many people have had excellent results without the tools as testified to by, for example, Rusty above.

Hope you've got enough shims left to get rid of that knock.
Good luck!
:-)


Ole S Olson
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Online Content
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
While the above adjustments are good to follow first hold a garden hose on the main oil feed pipe on the pan and under low water pressue see if all the pipes for the rods are flowing and not plugged-up.
After setting for many years the sludge settels in the pipes and becomes hard.
The aiming of the pipes is easy to check and compare with water pressure and the dipper depth in the troughs can be checked by filling the trough level in the center with grease and turning the engine over and checking the grove the dipper makes in the grease.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 03/04/22 06:55 PM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Thanks for the sage advice guys.
I checked the engine numbers years ago and it’s a numbers matching truck. Two acorn nuts on the valve cover and it still has the stove bolt screws on the oil pan. Seems like a fairly unmolested original.

So…
I just dropped the pan. My first observation was about a 1/4” deep dent in the pan right beneath the #6 rod. There was of course considerable muck in it from the water it had in it. The nozzles all look in tact except for #6 which looks to be sliced diagonally across the top surface. Wishful thinking has me hoping that the knock was simply the dipper smacking the nozzle but of course it could also be that the eroded nozzle starved the bearing for oil and shelled it out.
I have a 1953 chassis with complete driveline for parts.
Can I use the pan from it? I also have a 1938 HD chassis and drive line, but I’m pretty sure it’s different.



Also, were they using white primer in 1947?
Looks like it was first Blue then repainted green.

Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
If your 1953 parts vehicle is a truck, or a car with standard transmission, then the pan should fit.
But this is something Gene will know for sure, so maybe wait for his input.

You will still need to check the nozzle alignment in the 1953 pan.
And you will need to check the dippers.
For SURE you will need to check and probably replace the dipper on the #6 rod.

My 1946 truck seems to have a light grey primer under the green.


Ole S Olson
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
On my ‘37 the front of the oil pan had been pushed up very high. My thinking is that as Uncle Jimmy’s eyesight was failing he tried to lift the front of car with the jack on the oil pan. The bottom of the pan pushed the front troughs so high that the dipper hit the nozzle and broke off that tube for #2 rod. It did a pretty good job on the dipper also

A great VCCA member sent me a set of tubes for the cost of shipping. I was able to hammer the pan and troughs back into shape. The saving factor was that the engine had been run very little if any after the damage. The #2 rod bearing was fine. Using my home built gauges and methods I put everything back together. I’ve put almost 6000 miles on the car since I repaired it.


Rusty

VCCA #44680
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Online Content
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
If the pan from the 1953 and your present engine is a 216 it will (the 235 pan) require raising all of the oil troughs because the 235 oil troughs are lower due to the longer piston stroke of the 235,,,,,,,,,,,,,and that is not an easy job.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 03/05/22 05:50 PM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
I’ll check it out and see if there’s grey primer underneath the white.
My 1958 Apache has white primer underneath the Sand Beige but 11 years is a long time!
The 1953 is another panel truck frame and it has a 216.
I’m not crazy about hot rods but I’m always happy to haul away the carcasses once they’re through stripping the bodies off!



Originally Posted by Stovblt
If your 1953 parts vehicle is a truck, or a car with standard transmission, then the pan should fit.
But this is something Gene will know for sure, so maybe wait for his input.

You will still need to check the nozzle alignment in the 1953 pan.
And you will need to check the dippers.
For SURE you will need to check and probably replace the dipper on the #6 rod.

My 1946 truck seems to have a light grey primer under the green.

Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Originally Posted by Chev Nut
If the pan from the 1953 and your present engine is a 216 it will (the 235 pan) require raising all of the oil troughs because the 235 oil troughs are lower due to the longer piston stroke of the 235,,,,,,,,,,,,,and that is not an easy job.

I’m going to go ahead and pull the 1953 pan and check it out.
It’s been stored outside for years before I got it so I’m pretty sure it’s full of water too.

Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
The '53 pan should fit then.
I'm not keen on using good old vehicles to build hot rods either.
A sad waste in my view.
But, you are right, it leaves a good source of parts for the rest of us! :-)

Yes, your '47 and my '46 are only 1 year apart so the primer would seem to be more likely to be similar.
My truck was built in Kansas City by the way.
I don't know if all factories used the same primer?

Last edited by Stovblt; 03/05/22 06:43 PM.

Ole S Olson
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
That’s a good question. I need to decode the build plate at some point.
Now that the pan is out and I can see it better I don’t think the dent caused the trouble because there’s a few inches of space under the trough.

Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Next question.
Long story short.
Number four nozzle is boogered on the 1953 header.
It’s eroded in such a way that it is more of a square end than a diagonally cut end. However in running a stream of water through the inlet, the nozzle in question hits the same relative position as the others. So I’m thinking that the profile isn’t affecting the aim.

Assuming it’s unacceptable, are these assemblies lead soldered or silver soldered? I’m thinking of unsweating a nozzle from one to repair the other.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
Sorry we left you hanging on this question.

I wonder if you could use a small file or grinding stone or cutting disc in a Dremel to re-shape that end. That nozzle should work fine even if it is just a little shorter if it is aimed properly.

I have never understood why they beveled the ends of the tubes. My thinking is that they spent extra money to do it so there must have been a reason. That is why I suggest you rework that #4 nozzle.


Rusty

VCCA #44680
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Thanks for the information.
I have PLENTY to keep me busy, so it’s timeliness is not a problem!

I have been fabricating the oil trough gauge. All I had laying around was some 3/4” square tubing and 1/2” steel rod so it’s going to be practically indestructible!

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Online Content
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
The oil pan pipes are easily replaceable. They are just fastened to the pan with wire clips.
Often found on Ebay.


Gene Schneider
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Thanks, I already had a 1953 header handy.
Of course now I hope to pick your brains some more on splash oiling.

I am trying to get a sense of the flow rate at these nozzles at the RPMs when they are critical. If it’s a vigorous flow it’s good to go.

Most of the 1947 wire clips were broken, loose and mired in goo. Two came apart as I was removing them so I have 7.

Speaking of Goo,
I use wood stoves for heat and wood ash is amazing at absorbing the remaining goo left behind after scraping most all of it out. It saves on paper towels, rags and degreaser.

The flow is just a small concern because I’m not planning to put it on the road anytime soon. I’m only seeing if it’s going to run at this point. If it’s truly a problem I want to be sure to address it later.


I finally got around to soldering in one good 1947 nozzle to the 1953 header. (Both headers had one corroded nozzle) It’s aligned with all the others and it hits the same location on the inside of the pan as the others. However, when I reduce the water flow it has a weak stream so that it is the first nozzle to begin dropping below the other 5.

Testing my solder joint for leaks shows that it doesn’t shoot as far as the 1953 nozzles when removed from the pan and allowed to spray freely.

So I removed a different nozzle from the 1947, cleaned it’s bore thoroughly just to be sure and while better it was still slightly weaker than the others.
They look to have the same bore at the opening. Did they possibly increase the size of the nozzles after 1947? Or maybe it just wasn’t made on Wednesday in 1947!

So many questions…..
I appreciate your kind help fellers.

Last edited by KevinDK; 03/25/22 10:08 PM.
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Online Content
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
I have never seen where they increased the size of the nozzel. The oil supply for the nozzels come from th low presure side of the oiling system and is probally about 2 pounds at idle, just enough to fill the trough.


Gene Schneider
1 member likes this: KevinDK
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
Hi Kevin

Oil flow rate at the nozzles will be dependent entirely on the volume of oil the pump pumps at any given RPM, less the amount that flows past the main and camshaft bearings and the amount metered to the rocker arms.

We can only guess what proportion of the total goes to the nozzles, but given that the bearing clearances are very very small, and the six nozzles holes are quite large (between 7/64 and 1/8 inch I think), it is likely that by FAR the biggest part goes to the nozzles.

Total pump capacity was rated as 7.16 gallons per minute at 4000 RPM with hot oil.
So at idle total flow is likely around 1 gallon per minute.
And on the highway around 5 gallons per minute (assuming 2800 RPM).

So from there, your guess is as good as mine, but I'd guess in the vicinity of a little over 3/4 gallon per minute for all six nozzles together at idle.
And about 4 gallons per minute on the highway.

So...
Adjust your water flow until you are putting 1/2 QUART per minute in a container from one nozzle and you will see what it looks like when idling...
And adjust until you are putting 2/3 of a GALLON in a container from one nozzle and you should see what it looks like on the highway.

Hope this helps! :-)


Ole S Olson
1 member likes this: KevinDK
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Online Content
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,700
Likes: 141
"The oil that is metered to the rocker arms" is from the low pressure side of the oil distributor valve and the same low pressure oil supplies the oil pan trough tubes.


Gene Schneider
1 member likes this: KevinDK
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
KevinDK Offline OP
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 16
Thanks guys that’s a big help!
I’ll do some experimentation with stopwatch and gallon containers.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
ChatMaster - 4,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 4,000
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,021
Likes: 99
I am not sure what your container fill time data will tell you. You have already observed that the replacement nozzle is not flowing as much as the other 5. No matter what your data shows there will not be much flow at idle when the pump is only capable of producing 2 psi with hot oil. Remember that pressure is the result of resistance to flow.

My best guess is that there is some type of blockage in that pipe. It could be excess solder from the repair joint or it could be a piece of very reluctant sludge/goo. It seems like some of that crud will not dissolve with any cleaner and air pressure will not dislodge it. So it needs a more direct mechanical cleaning.

I used this trick on my ‘37 to make sure the tube that goes through the head and feeds oil to the rocker arms was clean. I squirted a small amount of brake cleaner into it multiple times over a couple of days. I could see that fluid would drip through but seemed like it was still partially clogged.

So I pushed a length of “safety wire” through it. I made sure the the wire had many small offsets and bends in it. I would pull and push it back and forth in the tube. That loosened some of the crud stuck to the inside diameter. The brake cleaner flowed better but I still thought it should be more . So I chucked the upper end of the wire in my drill and slowly rotated the wire while working it back and forth. Boy did that really clean things!

I have every good flow to the rocker arms.


Rusty

VCCA #44680
1 member likes this: KevinDK
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
ChatMaster - 1,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 75
It's true that the rocker arm oil came off the low pressure side up to and including 1939.

For 1940 and after, the rocker arm oil came off the HIGH pressure side.
But... it ran past a bleed off hole which ran back to the low pressure side of the oil distributor valve... and then through a metered orifice... and then into the line up to the rocker arms.

This change was made when the change to the newer style oil distributor valve with the sheet metal cover was made, and I suspect this was done to make lubrication more reliable and less likely to plug in the line up the rocker arms.

Last edited by Stovblt; 03/26/22 12:45 PM.

Ole S Olson
1 member likes this: KevinDK
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Support The VCCA!

Enjoy the forum? Become a VCCA member! The World's Best Chevrolet and GMC Club!


Member Photos
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
by DreamChevy, February 17
My 1933 Chevy 2 Dr. Sedan
My 1933 Chevy 2 Dr. Sedan
by 1939Chevy1, November 24
Back on the road 79 years later
2 1927 Chevrolet Trucks
2 1927 Chevrolet Trucks
by 1927TRUCKS, June 7
Who's Online Now
5 members (Bishop, Chev Nut, THH, bowtiefan, 1 invisible), 82 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
NeilA, Jayhicks, Tomvanhouten, Dads29Chevy, Tractorman
18,308 Registered Users
Today's Birthdays
aristech, RalphL, tonysk
Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics59,071
Posts429,069
Members18,308
Most Online1,133
Jan 22nd, 2020
 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5