|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,743 Likes: 11
ChatMaster - 1,500
|
OP
ChatMaster - 1,500
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,743 Likes: 11 |
OK, got the valve cover off ok. First thing is the #1 bolt is under the valve train. Do you remove the rockers and torque or skip #1 and do all the rest and HOPE for the best.
I did #2 - #15 @ 80 lbs. Some did not move, some very little, 2 about 1/8 turn. IS this normal?? Engine now has 470 miles but was put together nine years ago.
One other thing, head #839401 is the right head, I looked it up. The other # is H28 is that the date code '48 week 28????
Last edited by ruscar; 10/11/14 03:42 PM.
Russell #38868 '48 4 door Fleetline
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701 Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
|
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701 Likes: 141 |
They used to make a special off-set wrench for the center boolt. If it were mine I would leave well enough alone. The other movement you got would be considered normal.
Gene Schneider
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,194
ChatMaster - 1,000
|
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,194 |
If you used a modern head gasket a re-torque probably wasn't needed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,743 Likes: 11
ChatMaster - 1,500
|
OP
ChatMaster - 1,500
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,743 Likes: 11 |
I know nothing about the rebuild. Was out of my hands. I didn't think it could hurt anything?
Russell #38868 '48 4 door Fleetline
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,194
ChatMaster - 1,000
|
ChatMaster - 1,000
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,194 |
It won't hurt anything, I would have done the same thing if it was mine and I didn't know what kind of head gasket was used.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689 Likes: 21
ChatMaster - 6,000
|
ChatMaster - 6,000
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689 Likes: 21 |
It would seem to me that the only reason to re-torque head bolts, is to restore the pounds of pressure they exact upon the head gasket. Over time the bolts (and the head gasket) may relax somewhat and not have the torque originally imposed upon them. I think that if the bolts were not torqued beyond normal proprieties (elasticity, etc.) that re-torquing is not necessary. By the time the bolt relaxes enough to cause blow-by it will be about time to redo the engine anyway. Charlie
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701 Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
|
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701 Likes: 141 |
In 1941 Chevrolet suggested retorquing with every engine tune-up.
Gene Schneider
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689 Likes: 21
ChatMaster - 6,000
|
ChatMaster - 6,000
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,689 Likes: 21 |
Gene, Probably owing to the head gaskets used at the time. Was there a charge for that re-torquing? Was it common for the head bolts to turn any before the dial reached the desired torque value or calibrated torque wrench to click? Probably a little on each bolt. Anyway, I doubt that with modern head gaskets that it is necessary unless the bolts have been stretched previous Charlie
|
|
|
|
|