Reproduction Parts for 1916-1964 Chevrolet Passenger Cars & 1918-1987 Chevrolet & GMC Trucks



Visit the new site at vcca.org

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Grease Monkey
OP Offline
Grease Monkey
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1
Was wondering if anyone here could help me out i have a 65 chevy short c-10 fleetside and cant seem to figure out how to set the wood around the sides of the bed. also does anyone have a set of wiring schematics for the same truck i cant seem to find any without having to pay for them.

Wilwood Engineering1955-1957

Willwood Engineering

Wilwood Engineering designs and manufactures high-performance disc brake systems.
Wilwood Engineering, Inc. - 4700 Calle Bolero - Camarillo, CA 93012 - (805) 388-1188


#141175 04/16/09 10:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Shade Tree Mechanic
Offline
Shade Tree Mechanic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 34
Thanks for the info. Was thinking of going to 12 volt not because I thought it was necessary as my other vintage tin is 6 volt and never any problem. Was thinking the 261 might have higher compression which would nessitate staying with 12 volt. In the back of my head was remembering that was part of the reason Chevy went to 12 volt in 55. They deemed 6 volt hardly adequate to fire the plug with the increased compression of the 265. But that's a different animal. I now remember the 261 was introduced in 54 which was still 6 volt anyway. So I guess I'll stay with the 6 volt and go with the 216 starter and flywheel. Was thinking the increased power(torque) of the 261 would make possible a rear end ration in the range of 2.90 to 3.20? But only a guess on my part. Maybe too underpowered? What kind of reduction in rpm would I expect with 3.55 compared to org 4.11? In a Chevy PU parts catalog I have they have new high speed ring/pinion. 3.55 ratio for 40-54 and 3.38 for 55-62. I guess the higher 3.38 isn't manufactured to even be able to be installed in the older rear housing because of the difference in the rears between the years. I have a 59 Chevy which, I believe, has 3.55 gears. Would it be possible to install the gears into the 46 rear and keep the orig torque tube?

KenK #141178 04/16/09 11:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
ChatMaster - 25,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 25,000
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,701
Likes: 141
If you have a passenger car it would be very easy to install the 3.55 Powew Glide torque tube and carrier. If you have a truck you would need the special ring gear and pinion now being made.
Going from 4.11 to 3.55 would be about a 15 percent reduction in engine speed. This reduces the engine RPM's at 60 MPH from 3100 to about 2600. Makes 65 MPH easy.
Any other late axles would require changing to an open drive shaft and a later transmission.
A 1959 car with a standard transmission would have a 3.55, a P.G a 3.36. The parts would not interchange.

Last edited by Chev Nut; 04/16/09 11:17 AM.

Gene Schneider
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 885
ChatMaster - 750
Offline
ChatMaster - 750
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 885
Saw this on Chatter II before and is a nice thing to go to. If you know what rear end ratio you are using or want to use and you measure your tire diameter that you plan on using, this web site gives you the answer on their opening page as to rpm you are looking for. Its www.richmondgear.com/101032.html.

Jim.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,162
ChatMaster - 10,000
Offline
ChatMaster - 10,000
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,162
KenK, May I ask why you started 2 more new topics for 46 engine swap (46 engine swap 2 and 46 engine swap 3) rather than replying to the original thread (46 engine swap) about a 46 engine swap?
This is not a good idea, You are not getting the replys together on one thread.


Life's a long winding trail, love Jesus and ride a good horse!

Link Copied to Clipboard
 

Notice: Any comments posted herein do not necessarily reflect the official position of the VCCA.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5